How important is the cadence for runners to get right?

Share This Post

In the running community there is commonly a great deal of chat and in some cases fixation for the running form or technique with lots of opinions, a lot of comments from guru’s with lots of dogma rather than much scientific research to help with most of the dogma. The ideas from the so-called gurus and the way a runner ought to actually run can be quite diverse and quite often contradictory, which commonly leave the typical runner rather bewildered. There are plenty of variables to the different running methods such as where and how the foot contacts the ground as well as the position of the knee and hips. One that fairly recently got a great deal of attention was the cadence. Your cadence is how quick the legs turn over, generally assessed as the quantity of steps taken in a minute.

There are a variety of methods to determine the cadence and there are apps which can be used to ascertain the cadence. It is merely a matter of keeping track of the number of steps the athlete will take in a time period and then calculating that to one minute. Clearly there was just lately a growing pattern recommending for runners to reduce their stride length while increasing the rate which the legs turn over ie increase the cadence. The dogma is that when you can get the cadence close to 180 steps/minute then this is by some means a crucial solution to reduce the possibility for overuse injury while increasing performance. This particular 180 steps/minute was made popular by the famous running coach Jack Daniels. Daniels based this upon his studies of runners and their step cadences during the 1984 Olympic games. He extensively touted this being an ideal for all runners to strive for.

Consequently, the science has demonstrated that this cadence in athletes is normally rather variable with a few as little as 150-160 while others are about 200 steps a minute. It can appear to be a pretty personal thing with no one suitable cadence. It does seem that each runner will probably have their unique suitable cadence and this will vary amongst runners. Reducing the step length to raise the cadence may appear to have some benefits and that is based on a number of scientific studies, however just what is not supported is raising it to that particular mythological 180 which has been greatly recommended. It might help with runners that are overstriding and teach them not to stride so far in front when running. It does seem to help athletes who have difficulties with their knee joints as it will decrease the stresses in the knee, but it will nevertheless raise the strains in other places, so any alterations is required to be performed little by little , carefully and progressively.

What exactly is most vital with regard to runners to understand is that this is quite individual and it is a matter of working out by yourself or with the aid of a skilled running technique mentor precisely what is most effective for you as the individual. One point which has come out related to all of the hoopla around cadence should be to never be taken in by the newest craze or guru and try to find the more sensible and considered views.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>